Maintain data quality, not only software uptime
Software may keep producing results while images blur, lighting changes or instruments move. Monitor imaging quality and unreadable observations alongside device status. Process uptime alone may miss gradually deteriorating data.
Distinguish cameras and mounting from networks, software and models. Reflections require imaging checks; delay may originate in queues or receivers. Different failures have different owners and do not all require retraining.
Retain necessary review examples under appropriate access, together with model and configuration versions. Equipment or production changes can differ from trial data, so define retest triggers rather than assuming indefinite validity.
Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect all details.
Prepare controlled updates and recovery
Before updating, compare established references and new-condition examples with documented reasons and results. Development scores do not replace acceptance, and a higher version number does not establish improvement.
Recovery plans identify previous versions and settings, authorization and user fallback during outages. Recovered historical information must retain its original time rather than looking newly measured.
Inspection intervals, support and response times need agreement with an SI partner according to risk and scope. This guidance does not introduce unverified maintenance or recovery commitments.